Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Skin Penetration Time-Profiles for Continuous 810nm and Superpulsed 904nm Lasers in a Rat Model|
|Authors:||Joensen, Jon;Øvsthus, Knut;Reed, Rolf K.;Hummelsund, Steinar;Iversen, Vegard Vereide;Lopes-Martins, Rodrigo Álvaro Brandão;Bjordal, Jan Magnus|
|Publisher:||Mary Ann Liebert|
|Description:||This is a copy of an article published in the Photomedicine and Laser Surgery © 2012 copyright Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.; Photomedicine and Laser Surgery is available online at: http://online.liebertpub.com|
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the rat skin penetration abilities of two commercially available low-level laser therapy (LLLT) devices during 150 sec of irradiation. Background data: Effective LLLT irradiation typically lasts from 20 sec up to a few minutes, but the LLLT time-profiles for skin penetration of light energy have not yet been investigated. Materials and methods: Sixty-two skin flaps overlaying rat’s gastrocnemius muscles were harvested and immediately irradiated with LLLT devices. Irradiation was performed either with a 810 nm, 200mW continuous wave laser, or with a 904 nm, 60mW superpulsed laser, and the amount of penetrating light energy was measured by an optical power meter and registered at seven time points (range, 1–150 sec). Results: With the continuous wave 810nm laser probe in skin contact, the amount of penetrating light energy was stable at *20% (SEM – 0.6) of the initial optical output during 150 sec irradiation. However, irradiation with the superpulsed 904 nm, 60mW laser showed a linear increase in penetrating energy from 38% (SEM – 1.4) to 58% (SEM – 3.5) during 150 sec of exposure. The skin penetration abilities were significantly different ( p < 0.01) between the two lasers at all measured time points. Conclusions: LLLT irradiation through rat skin leaves sufficient subdermal light energy to influence pathological processes and tissue repair. The finding that superpulsed 904nm LLLT light energy penetrates 2–3 easier through the rat skin barrier than 810nm continuous wave LLLT, corresponds well with results of LLLT dose analyses in systematic reviews of LLLT in musculoskeletal disorders. This may explain why the differentiation between these laser types has been needed in the clinical dosage recommendations of World Association for Laser Therapy.
|Standard no:||Photomedicine and Laser Surgery 30(12): 688-694|
|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry|
Files in This Item:
Click on the URI links for accessing contents.
Items in HannanDL are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.