Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dl.umsu.ac.ir/handle/Hannan/141960
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWilder, Travis J-
dc.contributor.authorMcCrindle, Brian W-
dc.contributor.authorHickey, Edward J-
dc.contributor.authorZiemer, Gerhard-
dc.contributor.authorTchervenkov, Christo I-
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, Marshall L-
dc.contributor.authorGruber, Peter J-
dc.contributor.authorBlackstone, Eugene H-
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, William G-
dc.contributor.authorDeCampli, William M-
dc.contributor.authorCaldarone, Christopher A-
dc.contributor.authorPizarro, Christian-
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-18T09:49:46Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-18T09:49:46Z-
dc.date.issued2017-01-
dc.identifier.issn10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.08.021-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.umsu.ac.ir/handle/Hannan/141960-
dc.description.abstractFor neonates with critical left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO), hybrid procedures are an alternative to the Norwood stage 1 procedure. Despite perceived advantages, however, outcomes are not well defined. Therefore, we compared outcomes after stage 1 hybrid and Norwood procedures.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleIs a hybrid strategy a lower-risk alternative to stage 1 Norwood operation?en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal of thoracic _ cardiovascular2017



Items in HannanDL are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.