Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dl.umsu.ac.ir/handle/Hannan/27774
Title: Factors Associated with Self-Reported Repeat HIV Testing after a Negative Result in Durban, South Africa
Authors: Regan, Susan;Losina, Elena;Chetty, Senica;Giddy, Janet;Walensky, Rochelle P.;Ross, Douglas Sterling;Holst, Helga;Katz, Jeffrey Neil;Freedberg, Kenneth Alan;Bassett, Ingrid Valerie
subject: Medicine;Epidemiology;Clinical Epidemiology;Infectious Disease Epidemiology;Global Health;Infectious Diseases;Viral Diseases;HIV;HIV diagnosis and management;HIV epidemiology;Infectious Disease Control;Primary Care;Public Health;Behavioral and Social Aspects of Health;Health Screening;Social and Behavioral Sciences
Year: 2013
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Description: Background: Routine screening for HIV infection leads to early detection and treatment. We examined patient characteristics associated with repeated screening in a high prevalence country. Methods: We analyzed data from a cohort of 5,229 adults presenting for rapid HIV testing in the outpatient departments of 2 South African hospitals from November 2006 to August 2010. Patients were eligible if they were ≥18 years, reported no previous diagnosis with HIV infection, and not pregnant. Before testing, participants completed a questionnaire including gender, age, HIV testing history, health status, and knowledge about HIV and acquaintances with HIV. Enrollment HIV test results and CD4 counts were abstracted from the medical record. We present prevalence of HIV infection and median CD4 counts by HIV testing history (first-time vs. repeat). We estimated adjusted relative risks (ARR’s) for repeat testing by demographics, health status, and knowledge of HIV and others with HIV in a generalized linear model. Results: Of 4,877 participants with HIV test results available, 26% (N = 1258) were repeat testers. Repeat testers were less likely than first-time testers to be HIV-infected (34% vs. 54%, p<0.001). Median CD4 count was higher among repeat than first-time testers (201/uL vs. 147/uL, p<0.001). Among those HIV negative at enrollment (N = 2,499), repeat testing was more common among those with family or friends living with HIV (ARR 1.50, 95% CI: 1.33–1.68), women (ARR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.11–1.40), and those self-reporting very good health (ARR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.12–1.45). Conclusions: In this high prevalence setting, repeat testing was common among those undergoing HIV screening, and was associated with female sex, lower prevalence of HIV infection, and higher CD4 counts at diagnosis.
URI: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3633858/pdf/
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11180403
Standard no: Regan, Susan, Elena Losina, Senica Chetty, Janet Giddy, Rochelle P. Walensky, Douglas Ross, Helga Holst, Jeffrey N. Katz, Kenneth A. Freedberg, and Ingrid V. Bassett. 2013. Factors associated with self-reported repeat hiv testing after a negative result in durban, south africa. PLoS ONE 8(4): e62362.
1932-6203
Appears in Collections:HMS Scholarly Articles

Files in This Item:
Click on the URI links for accessing contents.


Items in HannanDL are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.