Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Cycling Empirical Antibiotic Therapy in Hospitals: Meta-Analysis and Models|
|Authors:||Abel zur Wiesch, Pia;Kouyos, Roger;Abel, Sören;Viechtbauer, Wolfgang;Bonhoeffer, Sebastian|
|subject:||Biology and Life Sciences;Computational Biology;Population Modeling;Infectious Disease Modeling;Evolutionary Modeling;Ecology;Microbial Ecology;Evolutionary Biology;Organismal Evolution;Microbial Evolution;Microbiology;Medical Microbiology;Microbial Pathogens;Bacterial Pathogens;Population Biology;Medicine and Health Sciences;Epidemiology;Infectious Disease Epidemiology;Infectious Diseases;Bacterial Diseases;Emerging Infectious Diseases;Infectious Disease Control|
|Publisher:||Public Library of Science|
|Description:||The rise of resistance together with the shortage of new broad-spectrum antibiotics underlines the urgency of optimizing the use of available drugs to minimize disease burden. Theoretical studies suggest that coordinating empirical usage of antibiotics in a hospital ward can contain the spread of resistance. However, theoretical and clinical studies came to different conclusions regarding the usefulness of rotating first-line therapy (cycling). Here, we performed a quantitative pathogen-specific meta-analysis of clinical studies comparing cycling to standard practice. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar and identified 46 clinical studies addressing the effect of cycling on nosocomial infections, of which 11 met our selection criteria. We employed a method for multivariate meta-analysis using incidence rates as endpoints and find that cycling reduced the incidence rate/1000 patient days of both total infections by 4.95 [9.43–0.48] and resistant infections by 7.2 [14.00–0.44]. This positive effect was observed in most pathogens despite a large variance between individual species. Our findings remain robust in uni- and multivariate metaregressions. We used theoretical models that reflect various infections and hospital settings to compare cycling to random assignment to different drugs (mixing). We make the realistic assumption that therapy is changed when first line treatment is ineffective, which we call “adjustable cycling/mixing”. In concordance with earlier theoretical studies, we find that in strict regimens, cycling is detrimental. However, in adjustable regimens single resistance is suppressed and cycling is successful in most settings. Both a meta-regression and our theoretical model indicate that “adjustable cycling” is especially useful to suppress emergence of multiple resistance. While our model predicts that cycling periods of one month perform well, we expect that too long cycling periods are detrimental. Our results suggest that “adjustable cycling” suppresses multiple resistance and warrants further investigations that allow comparing various diseases and hospital settings.|
|Standard no:||Abel zur Wiesch, Pia, Roger Kouyos, Sören Abel, Wolfgang Viechtbauer, and Sebastian Bonhoeffer. 2014. “Cycling Empirical Antibiotic Therapy in Hospitals: Meta-Analysis and Models.” PLoS Pathogens 10 (6): e1004225. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004225.|
|Appears in Collections:||HMS Scholarly Articles|
Files in This Item:
Click on the URI links for accessing contents.
Items in HannanDL are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.